


 |
|
 |
 |
Observation
checklist to track childrens work
| Type
of Submission: |
|
This
idea is a submission for:
X A curriculum
idea
__Cool things to do
__A special issue
|
|
| Age
group for whom this activity is appropriate:
|
3-5
year olds
| Brief
description of activity: |
I
created observation checklists so that I could see
how children work with the different software programs
| What
I did to set this up and how I followed through: |
|
I made up a chart showing the different software
programs we have. Down the side of the chart,
I typed in each childs name. Each week I
printed out a new chart to use. I hung the chart
next to the computer with a marker attached to
it. |
| Materials
used: |
Paper,
marker, MS Word or other word processing software
| What
the children had to do and what I wanted them
to learn: |
Each
time a child used the computer, he or she put a mark
in the appropriate box. I also used this chart to
help the children keep track of taking turns.
| Background:
How I got the idea: |
I wanted
to have a better idea of which software programs the children
were using. I noticed that some software (for example,
JumpStart and Franklin) offers a report on what kids are
playing on the software. I realized I could make up my
own system to accomplish this. Its important to
know what they are exploring and playing with. Kids were
complaining to me that some kids were "hogging"
the computer and wouldnt give others a turn. I thought
I needed a system that would be fair, would help the kids
take responsibility for themselves and how they were using
the computer, and would also help me keep track of what
they are doing.
|
| Analysis:
How the kids and/or parents responded: |
|
This
is a very simple tool but it gave me good information
over time about how the kids were using the software.
It also gives the kids a good opportunity to have responsibility
in recording their choices.
|
| Extension |
|
To
follow up, we made a graph showing how many birthdays
occurred in each month.
|
| CLICK
HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR OWN PROMISING PRACTICE |
|
|



|